Phoenix Child Custody Lawyer

The Phoenix child custody attorneys at Bishop Law Office P.C. provides quality representation in custody (legal decision making) cases where the parties were married when the parties have a child but were never married (paternity cases), and where the parties want to change or enforce a prior court order.


Contact a Phoenix Child Custody Attorney Today

If you would like more information regarding how the new legal decision making and parenting time laws may affect you, please call our office and schedule a consultation with one of our attorneys at Bishop Law Offices, P.C.

Contact us to schedule an appointment with an experienced Phoenix child custody lawyer if you have questions about child custody, visitation or parenting rights.

Types of Child Custody Cases

Relocation and Move-Aways

Learn about the legal requirements that must be met by a parent in order to relocate out-of-state with a child, or children.

Interstate Jurisdiction Issues

Learn about out-of-state custody and support matters including enforcement and/or modification of prior orders.

Post-Decree Modifications

Our post-decree modifications lawyers in Phoenix can help you request a post-decree modification of your child support orders, legal decision making, and parenting time orders, as well as spousal support decrees.


A paternity order is required to establish rights and benefits in cases involving unmarried couples and their children.

Grandparents’ Rights

Learn more about non-parent custody and visitation, “In Loco Parentis,” and how to file a request for custody and/or visitation.

As of 2013, Arizona revised its statutes (laws) regarding custody (legal decision making) and parenting time.

First and foremost, the term “custody” is no longer used in the statutes. The reason that such term was deleted is that parents often thought the term custody meant who gets the children. To the contrary, the term custody means legal decision making. Accordingly, the statutes have been changed to use the term “legal decision making” instead of legal custody. Such legal decision-making responsibilities include decisions regarding the children’s education (i.e. what school they attend, what classes they take, what programs they are involved in etc.), and health care decisions (i.e. what physician they see, whether they should attend counseling, elective procedures, etc.).

A new term has been added to the laws with regard to legal decision making, i.e. “personal care decisions”. The statutes recognize that each parent should make minor and routine decisions for the children during his / her own parenting time – i.e. bedtimes, homework, hygiene etc.). However, the more important decisions depend upon whether parents share joint legal decision making or whether one of the parties has sole legal decision making. Such major decisions may involve a child’s desire to have a tattoo or other body piercings, and other decisions which may significantly impact a child’s best interests.

One of the most important considerations for the Court in determining legal decision making is whether the parents have the ability to communicate and make important decisions together. If one of the parents refuses to communicate with the other in a civil manner and absent abusive and derogatory statements, etc., or refuses to respond to important inquiries, the Court may award sole decision making to the other party.

If one of the parents refuses to provide important information to the other parent, such parent may lose the right to make the important legal decisions regarding the child, and such authority may be granted to the other parent. Parents who “misbehave” may also be ordered to pay the other parent’s attorney fees.

The laws regarding legal decision making are set forth in Arizona Revised Statutes Section 25-401 forward. First and foremost, Courts are to look first and foremost to the children’s best interests in granting joint or sole legal decision making. The Court is supposed to assess all factors relevant to the child’s physical and emotional well being and sets forth some of the major factors that it looks to in Arizona Revised Statute Section 25-403.  Some of the bigger issues is whether either party has committed domestic violence against the other parent or children and whether either or both parents have recent substance abuse issues (drugs, alcohol etc.). The factors also include the past, present and future (anticipated) relationship between the children and the parents and other persons that may significantly impact the children’s lives. The Court looks to the children’s adjustment in their respective homes, schools, and community in general. Another factor is the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, specifically as it applies to the children’s best interests. The Court looks to whether the parents can get along for the benefit of the children, are able to communicate with each other in a reasonable manner, and whether either of the parents is more likely to allow meaningful contact with the other parent. The Court also considers whether either party has misled the Court.

Parenting Time

What is often called “visitation” by parents is formally referred to as  “parenting time” under Arizona law. What most parents fight over is parenting time with the children (i.e. should it be equal, or should one parent have the majority of the time). Over time, the statutes have been clarified to make it clear that absent evidence to the contrary, neither parent is to have priority over the other based upon the gender of the parent, the gender of the child, the age of the child, etc. Thus the terms “Mother’s Rights” or “Father’s Rights” are little more than buzz-words rather than having any legal effect.  Both parents are supposed to be treated the same under Arizona’s divorce and family laws.

Arguably, one of the most significant changes to the statutes provides for a presumption that the parents shall share legal custody or decision making, and that the Court shall maximize each parent’s respective parenting time with the children – so long as such is consistent with the children’s best interests. This would suggest that parents should be awarded equal parenting time (i.e. if each is to have maximum time) unless there is a valid reason not to have equal parenting time. Most judges agree that this has always been the case – i.e. that until they hear the evidence, such as the presumption. There are many circumstances that may warrant an unequal division of parenting time. Such circumstances may include the fact that one of the parents has a much stronger bond with the children, one of the parents has substance abuse issues, one of the parents has engaged in domestic violence against the other parent and/or children, one of the parents engages in unreasonable behaviors regarding the other parent or children, and various other reasons.  The factors that the Court looks at regarding parenting time are the same that apply to legal decision making as addressed above, although some of the factors may be more relevant to one of the issues as opposed to the other.

Can A Child Decide Where He / She Wants To Live?

Also included in the Arizona Revised Statute (ARS Section 25-403) is a factor that regards the wishes of the minor children “if they are of suitable age and maturity”.  There is no specified age in Arizona when a child’s wishes should be given consideration. Some children may be more mature at younger ages than others. In the case of parenting time, and if a child desires to reside more with one parent, it is also relevant why the child has such desire.   Sometimes the children have good reasons. On other occasions, their reasons may not be valid, such as when they have been improperly manipulated or alienated against the other parent, or when one of the parents provides more favors or fewer rules at their home.  As there are many factors that affect a Court’s decision, the desires of the children is not the end of the analysis, and the Courts often make decisions different than what the children desire.  It should be noted that minor children are not allowed to testify in Court, thus their desires are generally presented by different methods, including testimony from a mental health provider appointed by the Court or retained by one or both of the parties. Sometimes the Court will allow a parent to testify regarding their beliefs and experiences regarding the children’s desires, however, because of the rules of evidence, such is considered hearsay and may not be admitted depending upon whether a party has invoked the application of the Arizona Rules of Evidence.  In contested legal decision making/parenting cases, it is always smart to at least consult with a qualified family law attorney in order to ensure that the proper procedures are followed so that your evidence is not precluded during the trial or other evidentiary hearings.

Mental Health, Domestic Violence, Substance Abuse in Parenting Cases.

As noted above, a parties mental health issues, domestic violence, and substance abuse problems may have a substantial impact upon a Court’s legal decision making and parenting time decisions.

However, just because a party has “skeletons in their closet” does not necessarily mean that they will not be treated fairly and that they will not receive parenting time or joint legal decision making. Even in serious cases where a parent is provided supervised parenting time, such parenting time usually and eventually becomes unsupervised if the party complies with the Court’s orders including treatment orders or recommendations.

One of the most important things that the Court looks at is whether somebody has done something about their issues. For example, just because a person has been diagnosed with a mental health condition, such as depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety issues, etc., does not mean that the Court will find that such diagnosis is contrary to the best interests of the children. Rather, the Court is to look at the impact of such conditions, whether a person is complying with their medicines and therapy, and any other recommended treatment. If a parent has had no episodes that impacted the children, or no recent episodes, the fact that they have mental health issues should not by itself be a significant concern.

In the same regard, if a party had prior incidents of domestic violence against a spouse or the children, the Court looks to the severity of such instances, as well as how recent they are. In addition, the Court will look to whether somebody has sought treatment regarding their anger and other issues.

Substance abuse issues are generally treated in the same manner. The fact that you had a misdemeanor conviction for smoking pot 10 years ago, or an old DUI / DWI, will likely have little or no impact on your case. Again, the Court looks to the severity of the substance abuse, how recent it has been an issue, and what the party has done to rectify such issue. Courts may order drug testing or alcohol testing if there is an objective belief that substance abuse is a recent and material issue.

Medical marijuana use in custody/parenting cases is often raised. Because of the recent legalization of such, a parent with a valid card is not prohibited from using legal medical marijuana. In the same regard, the use of legalized marijuana cannot by itself be a reason that a Court minimized parenting time or does not order joint legal decision making.  However, the Court can look at whether there may be an impact on the children.  Similar to alcohol (which is of course legal to consume), if the use of legal marijuana affects the best interests of the children, the Court can enter orders necessary to protect the children, including not using marijuana while the children are in the parent’s care, prohibiting smoking in the home and/or around the children, etc.

If you would like more information regarding how the new legal decision making and parenting time laws may affect you, please call our office and schedule a consultation with one of our Phoenix child custody attorneys at Bishop Law Offices, P.C.

See Also: Child Support

Frequently Asked Questions and Additional Information Regarding Family Court and Parenting Issues


The Court now generally uses the term “parenting time” instead of the term visitation or access. Sometimes the parents are ordered to share parenting time equally, and at other times, one of the parents is awarded the majority of the parenting time. In extreme cases, a parent may only be allowed supervised parenting time.


Contrary to popular belief, there are many different options that you have regarding child custody (legal decision making) and visitation (parenting time). Such options focus upon what is in your children’s “best interests.” If the parents can agree upon what is in the best interests of their children between themselves, the Court will generally adopt such agreement. We suggest that you consult with a child custody attorney with regard to the “Parenting Plan Agreement” to make sure that you have covered all the necessary terms.


The term “custody” refers to “legal decision making” and not parenting time. The statute has been changed to eliminate the term custody and to use the term “legal decision making” instead.


Sometimes a party requests or the court orders the appointment of an expert to assist the court in determining the children’s best interest for purposes of parenting time, decision making and other court orders.

Private mental health specialists have created a less expensive and more expedient procedure for providing an assessment specifically applicable to the parenting issues involved in specific cases. Rather than conducting a full custody evaluation, which often leads to an expensive an lengthy report by the expert, a Limited Focused Assessment, or Limited Family Assessment, may be a great alternative. The parties to a Focused Assessment agree in advance regarding the specific issues and categories that need to be addressed during the assessment. The mental health provider will thus limit the assessment to those matters that are directly relevant to the legal decision making and parenting time issues as addressed in advance by the parties. The cost for such assessment generally ranges from $1,500.00 to $4,000.00 depending upon the extent and complexity of the issues. Sometimes the costs are divided equally or in some proportion. Other times, one of the parties is ordered to pay the entire amount.


The Court may order (but is not required to order) a Parenting Conference. The Superior Court provides certain programs to assist the Court in determining what is in the children’s best interests. The first step in a Parenting Conference is generally for a mental health provider to meet with the parents and attempt to negotiate agreements. If negotiations are unsuccessful, the mental health provider will interview the parents and may then interview the children.  The mental health provider may then provide recommendations regarding legal decision making, parenting time and other matters to the Court. Unlike mediation, the matters addressed during Parenting Conferences are not confidential and may be addressed to the court. There is a small charge to the parties for this service. A parenting conference may not necessarily result in a custody or parenting time recommendation and sometimes may have limited use.


The Court may order, but is not required to order, a comprehensive family evaluation (sometimes called a custody evaluation). This is where the Court assigns a private psychologist or mental health expert to provide recommendations to the Court regarding decision making, parenting time and other parenting issues.

These types of private custody evaluations are generally much more involved than Parenting Conferences and Limited Family Assessments. They often take longer than the other options. However, the mental health provider generally does much more as well. For example, the mental health provider (if a licensed psychologist) may provide for psychological testing of the parents. They may obtain documents from the parties and other sources (for example, prior counseling records, criminal records, etc.). They may interview the parties more often, and may interview the children more often. They may contact people involved in the children’s lives, such as relatives, witnesses, and others that have knowledge of relevant matters.  They may also determine whether one of the parties is attempting to alienate the children against the other party.

Sometimes a Parenting Conference or a Limited Family Assessment is sufficient. Sometimes a comprehensive evaluation may be more helpful. Such full evaluations cost generally between $4,000.00 and $7,000.00.


Alternate Dispute Resolution: The Court may assign your case to a judge pro-tem to conduct a settlement conference. This is similar to mediation, where the judge pro-tem assists the parties in reaching agreements regarding all aspects of their case.

Court Mediation: The Court has a mediation program for parenting issues only, most specifically parenting time and legal decision making. Again, the mediator is assigned to assist the parties in reaching agreements regarding such parenting issues.

Private Mediation: The parties at any time can agree to retain a private mediator, or a Court can order private mediation if it find the parties have the funds to do the same. Private mediation can address all issues in a case, including parenting issues as well as property and other financial issues.

Family Law Master: The Court can appoint a Family Law Master to investigate and provide recommendations to the Court regarding parenting issues as well as other issues. Such appointment must be agreed to by the parties.

Parenting Coordinator:  If the parties both desire and agree, the Court may appoint a parenting coordinator to address parenting issues as they come up after Court orders regarding legal decision making and parenting time are ordered. This can involve issues such as school choice, counseling for the children, new spouse or boyfriend / girlfriend issues, and any other issues that may involve the best interests of the children.  Previously, Courts could appoint Parenting Coordinators on their own or at either party’s request, however, more recently the law has changed so that both parents must agree to such appointment. Such appointment usually only last one year, and can substantially help the parties resolve matters outside of Court. By agreeing to a parenting coordinator, you are also agreeing that any decision that they make (so long as within their authority) are binding.



A parent can request that legal decision making or parenting time be modified. Sometimes a parent wishes a complete change in legal decision making. Sometimes a parent just wants more parenting time with the children. You generally must wait one year after the last court order to change legal decision making unless the children are or may be endangered physically or mentally, or unless the other parent has violated the parenting orders. This one-year requirement may not apply to minor changes in “parenting time.”

Sometimes a change in parenting time or decision making is warranted because the children want to live primarily with the other parent. Sometimes such change is warranted because of the children’s ages and changed needs. Sometimes parenting time needs to be changed because one of the parents has moved away. If the parties agree to such changes, the Court will generally adopt any agreements. Again, the parents should consult with an attorney to make sure all necessary terms are covered.


Whether a parent can relocate with the children out of state or even to the other side of town may depend upon whether such event is covered in the Court’s order and/or what is in the best interests of the children. You should always consult with a child relocation attorney in Phoenix before moving with the children. You should always consult with a child custody attorney if you think that the other parent is planning to move with the children and if such move may affect your rights or your parenting time.


In Arizona, a child’s wishes can always be considered if they are of suitable age and maturity. Judges generally do not interview children although they have the discretion to do so. Judges generally prefer that a mental health expert provide information regarding the children’s wishes and circumstances. Judges will sometimes allow the parents to tell the judge what the children want, however, the judge may not allow such testimony if the other parent objects.

These are only a few of the major questions that our clients often ask. Bishop Law Offices, P.C. is more than happy to answer any questions you may have during your consultation with us.


Maricopa County has in the past provided certain “guidelines” regarding parenting time. However, every case is different. These guidelines are not set in stone, nor do they state which parent (i.e. mother or father) is considered the primary parent. Rather, the Court looks at what is in the children’s best interests. Sometimes it is best that one of the parents is the primary residential parent. Sometimes it is best if the parties have equal time.

Arizona Statutes provide that the courts cannot base its parenting decisions upon a parent’s gender (i.e. there is no presumption in favor of mothers or fathers).

Read more about Arizona’s Parenting Time Guidelines.


Arizona has statutes (rules) that set forth specific factors that the Court should address in deciding the best interests of the children. There are other factors, which may not be written in the statutes, but may be important. These factors include but are not limited to the following.


A Parenting Coordinator (PC) is a mental health expert, attorney, or other expert appointed by the Court after final parenting orders are entered. Such appointment must be agreed to by the parties. A PC can meet with the parties and attempt to resolve parenting issues as they arise. Examples of such issues are numerous; i.e. where the children go to school, the effect of new significant others on the children, continued communication problems between the parents, vacation and travel disputes, enforcement of parenting time issues, inappropriate parenting complaints, and essentially any other issues that directly or indirectly involve the children.

Generally, a PC attempts to guide and assist the parents in reaching an agreement on how issues are to be addressed. The PC is much more than a mediator, however. The PC has the authority to make decisions and/or recommendations to the Court regarding the various parenting issues. A PC can be an invaluable resource to assist parties who are unable to communicate or resolve ongoing issues.

A PC generally does not have the authority to recommend significant changes in decision making or parenting time. If a party desires an expert’s input regarding significant legal decision making or parenting time changes, a comprehensive family evaluation, limited focus assessment or Parenting Conference is generally required.

Pursuant to recent changes to Rule 72 of the Arizona Rules of Family Court Procedure, a Parenting Coordinator can only be appointed by agreements of the parties.